News Release, Office of the Maryland Attorney General
BALTIMORE, MD (July 21, 2020)– Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh today joined a coalition ofattorneys general in filingalawsuitchallenging theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final ruleunlawfullycurtailingstate authority under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. For more than three decades, the EPA has consistently acknowledged and respected that Section 401 provides states with the authority to review, impose conditions on,or deny certification for federally permitted projects. However,as directed byPresident Trump’sApril 2019 executive order, the EPA issued a final rule radically alteringits water quality certification regulations torestrictstate authority under the Clean Water Act. In the lawsuit, the coalition argues that the final rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and Clean Water Act and must be vacated.
“Congress rightly granted states the authority to protect the health of their waterways,” said Attorney General Frosh. “The Trump administration has already undermined federal clean water standards. Now, it is threatening to obstruct the states when they seek to protect their lakes, coastlines, wildlife habitats and, in Maryland, the Chesapeake Bay. Donald Trump may favor polluters over people, but we do not. We will fight to protect our natural resources.”
The Clean Water Act reflects Congress’ policy to “recognize, preserve, and protect the primary responsibilities and rights of states to prevent, reduce, and eliminate pollution” of waters within their borders. Under Section 401 of the statute, a project requiring federal approval that may result in discharges into the waters of the United States must obtain state certification confirming that the project meets state water quality standards and other appropriate state law requirements. The projects requiring Section 401 certification range from housing and commercial land development, to hydropower and pipeline construction. This certification process ensures adequate assessment of theimpacts of proposedprojectsand the imposition of necessary conditions to remedy these impacts.
On July 13, 2020, the EPA issued a final rulearbitrarily re-writing existing water quality certification regulations to limit state authority under the Clean Water Act. The rulewillimpair states’ ability to fully and efficiently review project proposals for water quality impacts and make it more difficult for states to fulfill their fundamental obligation to protect their waters and wetlands. The multistatecoalition challenging the rulerepresents a substantial portion of the United States, includingthe Chesapeake Bay, the entirety of the Pacific Coast from Mexico to Canada, large portions of the Atlantic Coast, the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain, and the majority of the Columbia River.
In the lawsuit, the coalition argues that the EPA’s drastic curtailment of state authority under Section 401 is unlawful because it iscontrary to:
- The plain language, structure, purpose, and legislative history of the CleanWaterAct;
- Binding Supreme Court precedent interpreting Section 401; and
- The EPA’s own guidance on Section 401, which spans decades and multiple administrations.
In 2019, Attorney General Frosh joinedmultistate coalitions in filing comment letters opposing the EPA’s unlawfulguidanceandproposed ruleseeking to curtail state authority under Section 401ofthe Clean Water Act.
In filing the lawsuit, Attorney General Frosh joins the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia.