For more than a century, when someone wanted to buy a home all they had to do was walk into a real estate office and ask the agent to start showing them properties. That agent was paid by the seller if a deal ever went through.

All that changed Saturday.

As part the settlement of a lawsuit brought by home sellers, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) agreed that sellersโ€™ agents will no longer share the commission with buyersโ€™ agents for a successful sale. Now, buyers have to agree upfront to pay their agents independent of the seller.

Itโ€™s a change that agents said they have spent months preparing for. But that doesnโ€™t mean theyโ€™re crazy about it.

โ€œThe buyer and the tenant are the ones at โ€ฆ risk of losing the most, due to the fact that they may not be able to obtain or afford proper representation,โ€ said Gregory Gray, a real estate agent based in Howard County. โ€œIt tilts the scale in favor of the seller.โ€

But the change was defended by NAR President Kevin Sears, who said in a written statement last week that the changes โ€œhelp to further empower consumers with clarity and choice when buying and selling a home.โ€

โ€œAs the August 17 practice change implementation date approaches, I am confident in our membersโ€™ abilities to prepare for and embrace this evolution of our industry,โ€ his statement said.

The lawsuit against NAR claimed that its previous rules were anticompetitive. Under those rules, sellers had to agree to pay buyers if they wanted their home to show up in the associationโ€™s listing of properties for sale.

Under the settlement announced in March, NAR requires that buyers have an agreement with their agents before they begin house-hunting, and it allows sellers to list their homes without having to pay the buyerโ€™s agent.

The shift could be less painful in Maryland, which has had required written buyer agreements since 2016, said Maryland Association of Realtors President Chuck Kasky. But the new written agreements must disclose the amount or rate of compensation of a buyer agent, Kasky said in aย resource videoย explaining the change.

โ€œReal estate licensees will be required to enter into written agreements with buyers before touring a home. This applies to houses listed on a multiple listing service,โ€ Kasky explained. 

Judith Egbarin, the owner of Blue Ribbon Realty, said that under the new arrangement will hit buyers the hardest. 

โ€œThey want the buyers to pay commission to their own agents, so whoโ€™s going to lose out the most?โ€ Egbarin asked. She answered her own question by noting that โ€œthe buyer now has to come out of pocket even more.โ€

She said this will add to the fees that the buyer traditionally has to pay, like down payments and closing costs. 

Jennifer Young, from Jennifer Young Realty, agreed with Egbarin. Young said the new settlement would most negatively affect first-time home buyers. 

โ€œI donโ€™t think itโ€™s a good thing. So I think itโ€™s going to hurt buyers who are no-money-down, low-money-down buyers, first-time buyers, grant program buyers,โ€ Young said. โ€œSo thereโ€™s potentially more cost to have proper representation.โ€ 

But none of the agents felt defeated by the settlement and, in fact, all were looking ahead. Young said her firm had been preparing its agents for months before Saturdayโ€™s shift and Gray said that the settlement will leave a competitive landscape for buyersโ€™ agents. 

โ€œItโ€™s going to be very competitive, and theyโ€™re going to have to show their value if they want to obtain the commission,โ€ Gray said. โ€œTheyโ€™re not getting it from the seller or the landlord, theyโ€™re going to have to get it from their client, and theyโ€™re going to have to be able to negotiate.โ€

Egbarin said that real estate will just have to adapt and adjust.

โ€œItโ€™s just, we need to get used to it. And we will adjust,โ€ she said. โ€œIโ€™m not frustrated yet, I am very optimistic, I want to see what happens.โ€


Leave a comment